Problem: Investigate convergence of the following power series:
Solution:
We see that the center of this power series is
1. We investigate absolute convergence of
Here the usual choice - the Root test - is not very wise due to that factorial, we prefer to use the Ratio test.
We know that the series converges absolutely if lambda is less than one,
which here happens exactly if
2. We investigate absolute convergence of
Here both of our favorite tests would work quite well, so to have some variety we will try the Root test.
We know that the series converges absolutely if rho is less than one,
which here happens exactly if
Since we know that the radius of convergence of a sum of two series is given
by minimum of their individual radii (assuming that they are not equal,
which is our case), we conclude that the radius of convergence of the
given series is
Thus the interval of convergence is
Conclusion: The given series has the center
Remark on radius: Why do we take when adding two series with distinct
radii o convergence the smaller one? Assume that the radii are
Then we move further out, and when we are in the annulus between radii R1 and R2 then one series converges and the other diverges, thus their sum is divergent on this region. According to the theorem on behavior of radius of convergence, it means that the radius of convergence of this sum cannot be more than R1.
If we move still further out, beyond R2, then both series are be divergent and in general it could happen that their reasons for divergence would cancel out in the sum. However, this is not possible with power series. We know that for them convergence at some point necessarily means also convergence on the disc reaching up to that point, therefore we convergence cannot pop up anywhere beyond that annulus of divergence.
We also see that if the two radii were equal, then there would be no region of guaranteed divergence and thus there would be nothing to prevent situation when outside of the radius R1 = R@ two divergent power series add up to a convergent one. And this can indeed happen, then the radius of convergence of the sum is larger then the minimum of radii of convergence of the individual summands.